[Pharo-dev] why can't we select the browser we want to use anymore via the window menu?

phil at highoctane.be phil at highoctane.be
Mon Nov 25 03:18:05 EST 2013


Exactly. This researcher/industry - lab/delivery is always present, no
matter where one goes.

I was thinking more along the lines of:


Investing in the industry

Thousands of vendors depend on Intel® processors for product development.
To help them forge ahead with new product advancements, Intel invests
heavily in research that drives innovations at the silicon level and
establishes new, industry-wide standards. *Combined with the predictability
*of Intel’s tick-tock model, these efforts promote faster, more efficient
innovation throughout the industry—year-in and year-out.








---
Philippe Back
Dramatic Performance Improvements
Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
Mail:phil at highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu
Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos

High Octane SPRL
rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
http://spamcast.libsyn.com
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value
Added Reseller




On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Norbert Hartl <norbert at hartl.name> wrote:

>
>
> Am 24.11.2013 um 21:18 schrieb Marcus Denker <marcus.denker at inria.fr>:
>
>
> On 24 Nov 2013, at 21:08, phil at highoctane.be wrote:
>
> This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements.
>
>
> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html
>
> Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row.
> That may be too much.
>
> I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts
> that are changing in all corners.
>
>
> Maybe we should give up, define Pharo as finished and be happy.
>
>
> I don't think that every statement that has a notion like the one from
> phil needs a response out of self-defense. This will happen as long as the
> "researcher guys" and the "industry guys" share the same table. It is just
> the way it is and we are free to leave statements uncommented.
>
> Norbert
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131125/278f1f40/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list