[Pharo-dev] why can't we select the browser we want to use anymore via the window menu?

Norbert Hartl norbert at hartl.name
Mon Nov 25 02:42:58 EST 2013



> Am 24.11.2013 um 21:31 schrieb Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com>:
> 
> I am using Pharo 3.0 in production and it is highly reliable.
> 
So it is not just reliable but highly reliable? What does it mean and what do you call "using in production"?

Norbert
> Doru
> 
> 
>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, phil at highoctane.be <phil at highoctane.be> wrote:
>> This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements.
>> 
>> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html
>> 
>> Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That may be too much.
>> 
>> I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that are changing in all corners.
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> Philippe Back
>> Dramatic Performance Improvements
>> Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
>> Mail:phil at highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu
>> Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
>> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos
>> 
>> High Octane SPRL
>> rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium
>> 
>> Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
>> Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - http://spamcast.libsyn.com
>> Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
>>> Hi guys
>>> 
>>> It would be good not to clean without a clear vision.
>>> For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu of a window.
>>> Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point:
>>> 
>>>         - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion, Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, …..
>>>         and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage Pharo with configurations.
>>> 
>>>         - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the part of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon
>>>         on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because
>>>         we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10 packages and 10 classes more in the system.
>>>         I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration inside the image. To me this is totally stupid
>>>         not to do it.
>>> 
>>>         - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we will remove the old browser
>>>         but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs outside the image to see if you succeed.
>>> 
>>> So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes.
>>> 
>>> Stef
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> www.tudorgirba.com
> 
> "Every thing has its own flow"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131125/67afc509/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list