[Pharo-dev] why can't we select the browser we want to use anymore via the window menu?

Tudor Girba tudor at tudorgirba.com
Sun Nov 24 15:31:02 EST 2013


I am using Pharo 3.0 in production and it is highly reliable.

Doru


On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, phil at highoctane.be <phil at highoctane.be>wrote:

> This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements.
>
>
> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html
>
> Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row.
> That may be too much.
>
> I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts
> that are changing in all corners.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> ---
> Philippe Back
> Dramatic Performance Improvements
> Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
> Mail:phil at highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu
> Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos
>
> High Octane SPRL
> rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium
>
> Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
> Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
> http://spamcast.libsyn.com
> Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value
> Added Reseller
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
> stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> It would be good not to clean without a clear vision.
>> For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu
>> of a window.
>> Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point:
>>
>>         - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion,
>> Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, …..
>>         and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage
>> Pharo with configurations.
>>
>>         - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the
>> part of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon
>>         on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because
>>         we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10
>> packages and 10 classes more in the system.
>>         I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration
>> inside the image. To me this is totally stupid
>>         not to do it.
>>
>>         - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we
>> will remove the old browser
>>         but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs
>> outside the image to see if you succeed.
>>
>> So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>
>


-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131124/b32cd97a/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list