[Pharo-dev] why can't we select the browser we want to use anymore via the window menu?

phil at highoctane.be phil at highoctane.be
Sun Nov 24 15:08:04 EST 2013


This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements.

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html

Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That
may be too much.

I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts
that are changing in all corners.

Phil



---
Philippe Back
Dramatic Performance Improvements
Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
Mail:phil at highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu
Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos

High Octane SPRL
rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
http://spamcast.libsyn.com
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value
Added Reseller




On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
> wrote:

> Hi guys
>
> It would be good not to clean without a clear vision.
> For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu
> of a window.
> Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point:
>
>         - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion,
> Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, …..
>         and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage
> Pharo with configurations.
>
>         - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the
> part of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon
>         on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because
>         we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10
> packages and 10 classes more in the system.
>         I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration
> inside the image. To me this is totally stupid
>         not to do it.
>
>         - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we
> will remove the old browser
>         but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs
> outside the image to see if you succeed.
>
> So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes.
>
> Stef
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131124/5bb03be3/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list