[Pharo-dev] Patches for Pharo packages you are maintaining

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Sun Nov 24 04:29:47 EST 2013



> I like the monkey…

we talk about the picture

> but I really don't care if is there or not. 
> Now... I think there are some real bugs in the bug tracker (like not updating the list). 
> 
> I do not like fogbugz, I find it heavy, hard to use and a real pain in my ***, but I also think that "you do not change horses in the middle of the race" :)
> 
> Esteban
> 
> 
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:38 AM, phil at highoctane.be <phil at highoctane.be> wrote:
> killing ugly monkey picture: +1000! (a reason why I don't go there BTW, it scares me).
> 
> Phil
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> So registering on Pharo tracker *never* worked for me, since I try,
> >> before the summer.
> >>
> >
> > In the end I think is was a mistake to use fogbugz. For sure it’s nice for companies, but
> > for open sourse projects it just does not work with a closed bug tracker.
> >
> > Now the question is what is the effort to move to yet another one?
> 
> I do not like fogbugz but I would not change now.
> Let us
>         - make it easy for people to log
>         - remove this ugly monkey pictures (I do not like it - do you think that people can understand anything with it.
>         - get a newer version of smalltalkhub
> and continue.
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131124/b9231d73/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list