[Pharo-dev] Spotlight behaviour

kilon alios kilon.alios at gmail.com
Wed Nov 20 10:24:23 EST 2013


oh and Sven just installed flux and tried it, brilliant thanks for the
recommendation. Still does not beats dark themes, but certainly helps  :)
Halogen setting makes it easier to my eyes.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:15 PM, kilon alios <kilon.alios at gmail.com> wrote:

> Esteban thats look great to me, I would have gone as far as turing the
> background of text editor to pitch black but even this theme is more than
> fine for me. So yes it will be wise to post your code to smalltalkhub and
> let us help you out with this. I am most certainly be interested to
> contribute , dark themes are essential to my coding workflow.
>
> Sven its not so much about brightness, I find white as color, tiresome ,
> especially when I read text. The curios thing is that my eyes get strained
> only with the white on screen and not on paper, I always have my brightness
> at lowest level. But in the end, black is my color. A drak theme is better
> because its not just a lower lightness thing its also the correct contast
> at least for my eyes.
>
> About icons its a valid concern, but not a big deal for me right now.
> Pharo needs a good theme support, my project will hopefully bring this to
> the table but it will take me a lot of time to get there.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> btw... my goal is to achieve this:
>>
>>
>> http://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2013/06/11/inside-darcula-look-and-feel-an-interview-with-konstantin-bulenkov/
>>
>> (as Phil suggested some time ago, in a thread which was the reason I
>> started to try a dark theme).
>>
>> Also... my intention is to contribute to clean a bit morphic by removing
>> silly hardcode stuff and creating a separation betweek "skin" and
>> "morph"... and more important, to easy the creation of new skins.
>>
>>  but I still do not find a design that satisfy me... we'll see.
>>
>> Esteban
>>
>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > ok... I will package it and made it available in the course of the day
>> then.
>> > more hands means faster results :)
>> >
>> > Esteban
>> >
>> > On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 20 Nov 2013, at 14:42, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> :)
>> >>>
>> >>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 2.40.12 PM.png>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm slowly working in a darktheme... problem is the INCREDIBLE amount
>> of hardcode colors and silly code.
>> >>> So it will take some time until is ready (also because I work on it
>> when I'm bored and not wanting to do what I should do... like today :P)
>> >>
>> >> Hey, Esteban, that looks already quite impressive.
>> >> I am sure there are some people really anxious to try this and help.
>> >> Is this theme already available somewhere ?
>> >>
>> >>> Esteban
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:34 PM, kilon alios <kilon.alios at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> yes I can confirm that this work also on windoom 7. Indeed Sven your
>> Pharo looks a bit more sexy than mine.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> the code you posted works also like a charm for me , thank you. Now
>> If I could get also a dark theme working with pharo that would be awesome.
>> All this white hurts my eyes. But I guess I will have to compromise for the
>> time being :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> thank you
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:46, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Sven.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> What version are YOU using? Fonts and windows look so clean an
>> sharp! :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ;-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yes they are.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Like I said, Pharo version #30582
>> >>>>
>> >>>> defaultFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>> >>>> listFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>> >>>> menuFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>> >>>> windowTitleFont Source Sans Pro Bold points: 12 height: 21
>> >>>> balloonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
>> >>>> codeFont Source Code Pro Normal points: 11 height: 19
>> >>>> buttonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>> >>>> haloFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Installed with a script from our local look and feel guru, Doru:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> #('SourceCodeProRegular' 'SourceCodeProBold' 'SourceSansProRegular'
>> 'SourceSansProBold’)
>> >>>> do: [ :each |
>> >>>>   Smalltalk globals
>> >>>>     at: each asSymbol
>> >>>>     ifAbsent: [
>> >>>>       Gofer new
>> >>>>         smalltalkhubUser: 'girba' project: 'FreeFonts';
>> >>>>         package: each;
>> >>>>         load ].
>> >>>>   (Smalltalk at: each asSymbol) new install ].
>> >>>> FreeTypeSystemSettings loadFt2Library: true.
>> >>>> FreeTypeFontProvider current updateFromSystem.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> StandardFonts
>> >>>> setAllStandardFontsTo: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro'
>> pointSize: 12);
>> >>>> haloFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9);
>> >>>> windowTitleFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro Bold'
>> pointSize: 12);
>> >>>> balloonFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize:
>> 9);
>> >>>> codeFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Pro' pointSize: 11).
>> >>>>
>> >>>> And then I finally make the window font bold, manually.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The screenshot was done on Mac OS X 10.9
>> >>>>
>> >>>> HTH,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sven
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2013/11/20 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu>
>> >>>>> What version are you using ?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> In #30582 it does work:
>> >>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 13.34.46.png>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You can always try typing a space after Object…
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sven
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:23, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk at me.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> HI,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> do you know why search behaves like this? I was expecting Object
>> to show up
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> <Screenshot 2013-11-20 13.20.40.png>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Cheers
>> >>>>>> Uko
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131120/774953d0/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list