[Pharo-dev] Spec new release :)

Benjamin Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 18:59:01 EST 2013


I ask Damien Cassou this morning about that.

He told me it should be quite easy to do :)
(just another visitor I guess)

Ben

On 13 Nov 2013, at 20:28, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu> wrote:

> 
> On 13 Nov 2013, at 20:22, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel at me.com> wrote:
> 
>> Why not generating markdown code from pier code?
>> If the whole problem is exposure on the web. Someone has considered pdf2html or latex2html? Maybe my question is naive, I do not know.
> 
> It is not silly, and yes it could be done quite easily I guess, if it even has not yet been done already. 
> 
>> On some point, i have tried to generate the roassal documentation from the Roassal Help, but it makes the maintenance loop heavy: If I want to fix something in the text, I had to edit the Help in Pharo, generating the document, compiling into .pdf. Quite heavy it was. At the end, I only worked on the .tex files.
>> 
>> Alexandre
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 13, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:59, Benjamin <Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It was a real question, and it feels like you overreacted the answer …
>>>> 
>>>> To me, markdown or pier is a new syntax to learn so I am asking …
>>>> To me, doing Pier because you do or because you said to is no really an argument.
>>>> 
>>>> Then I am open to a real answer but I also see that markdown is integrated to a lot of tools (github and jekylls by examples)
>>>> and that a lot of people knows about markdown.
>>>> 
>>>> This was a real question, not a troll …
>>> 
>>> I like .md as well and yes, the github integration makes it compelling.
>>> 
>>> But one objective argument against Markdown and in favour of Pier is that the former has no good parser and/or document model and and the latter does have both, in Pharo. That means that we can write all sorts of tools ourselves and get things finished, as was proven with the books.
>>> 
>>> There simply isn’t any definitive, unambiguous Markdown syntax (the github variant is only one version).
>>> 
>>>> Ben
>>>> 
>>>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:22, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> do you really think that I insist of using pier syntax because
>>>>> 	A- I want to lose my time
>>>>> 	B- this is for my ego?
>>>>> 	C- because I'm funny
>>>>> 	D- ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> No seriously?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you want to get an answer read the thread that yuri raised a while ago.
>>>>> Because we already discussed discussed and discussed it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I will not write any book in markdown. Now you can try and we see.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Stef
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Stef, what is the advantages of writing it in Pier compared to markdown ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ben
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131114/0bb3c349/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list