[Pharo-dev] Spec new release :)

Benjamin Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo at gmail.com
Tue Nov 12 08:52:02 EST 2013


There is one reported since yesterday I think about missing morphic bindings ;)

Thanks for your feedback :)

Ben

On 12 Nov 2013, at 14:48, Martin Dias <tinchodias at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think there is some issue with TreeColumnModel. For example:
> 
> TreeModel exampleWithCustomColumnsAndNodes
> 
> Raises "ByteSymbol(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #adapt:"
> 
> Should I report in fogbugz?
> 
> thanks,
> Martín
> 
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
>> Yes this is what I did for the change sorter. I do not like this DSL like
>> way of passing block over block over block
>> over blocks.
>> 
>> I love blocks but methods are named blocks and I prefer them.
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> biut that method can be written:
>> 
>> aMenu addGroup: (MenuGroupModel new
>> addItem: (MenuItemModel new
>> name: 'Browse Full';
>> action: [ self browseSelectedObject ];
>> shortcut: $b command mac | $b alt win | $b alt unix);
>> addItem: (MenuItem new
>> name: 'Browse Class';
>> action: [ self browseSelectedObjectClass ])).
>> 
>> and you do not have to declare variables for that (and is a lot better than
>> using a block, IMO).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Benjamin <Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> One can just use an object too.
>> 
>> It’s just that otherwise, it pollutes a bit the method with tons of inst
>> vars
>> (and then you forget to use them :P)
>> 
>> Ben
>> 
>> On 12 Nov 2013, at 13:05, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:22 AM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> It is not necessary better, but it saves you from having hundreds of temp
>> vars :)
>> 
>> Ben
>> 
>> On 12 Nov 2013, at 01:49, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Example:
>> aMenu addGroup: [ :aGroup |
>> aGroup addItem: [ :anItem |
>> anItem name: 'Browse Full';
>> action: [ self browseSelectedObject ];
>> shortcut: $b command mac | $b alt win | $b alt unix  ].
>> aGroup addItem: [ :anItem |
>> anItem name: 'Browse Class';
>> action: [ self browseSelectedObjectClass ] ] ].
>> 
>> 
>> I do not see the value of passing block to add element to groups
>> why not the normal way i.e. passing an object. I do not get why executing
>> a block with an object is better?
>> 
>> 
>> he, I thought the same :)
>> 
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131112/7a6118a4/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list