[Pharo-dev] Deep Into Pharo: PPExpressionParser

Sean P. DeNigris sean at clipperadams.com
Thu Nov 7 11:31:31 EST 2013


Thanks, that's exactly what I was wondering. That would be a valuable clarification in the book. Is there an issue tracker?

-------- Original message --------
From: "Damien Cassou [via Smalltalk]" <ml-node+s1294792n4719808h36 at n4.nabble.com> 
Date: 11/07/2013  7:38 AM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: "Sean P. DeNigris" <sean at clipperadams.com> 
Subject: Re: Deep Into Pharo: PPExpressionParser 
 
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: 
> Thanks! I'm clear on how to use them, just not on why to choose one over the 
> other.. 

I would say you can instantiate a PPExpressionParser if you want to do 
a small parser for small task. Now, if you have a grammar that's 
composed of many parsers, I would subclass PPCompositeParser. 

-- 
Damien Cassou 
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without 
losing enthusiasm." 
Winston Churchill 



If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.world.st/Deep-Into-Pharo-PPExpressionParser-tp4719454p4719808.html
To unsubscribe from Deep Into Pharo: PPExpressionParser, click here.
NAML



-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Deep-Into-Pharo-PPExpressionParser-tp4719454p4719909.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131107/033c790f/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list