[Pharo-dev] Selecting a package in the Monticello browser

phil at highoctane.be phil at highoctane.be
Sun Nov 3 17:25:46 EST 2013


See also https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10263
Phil

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:

> Thanks.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel at me.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12064/Selecting-a-package-in-the-Monticello-browser
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin <
>> benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Nope :(
>> >
>> > Ben
>> >
>> > On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:52, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Strange. Pharo 2.0 does not seem to have the replication of repository
>> instances problem. Any idea what introduced this?
>> >>
>> >> Doru
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Benjamin <
>> Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per
>> package.
>> >> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber}
>> instances.
>> >>
>> >> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was
>> not reflected to the others.
>> >> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced.
>> >>
>> >> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for
>> everything).
>> >> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use
>> to be :)
>> >>
>> >> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :)
>> >> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this
>> painful behaviour (2 sprints ago)
>> >>
>> >> Ben
>> >>
>> >> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the
>> relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain?
>> >>>
>> >>> Doru
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin <
>> benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ben
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello
>> browser is a rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of
>> repositories was useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Doru
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
>> alexandre.bergel at me.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> Hi!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set
>> of relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the
>> case anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated
>> to a repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather
>> convenient...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Alexandre
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> >>>>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> >>>
>> >>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> www.tudorgirba.com
>> >>
>> >> "Every thing has its own flow"
>> >
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131103/a72c4976/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list