[Pharo-dev] Selecting a package in the Monticello browser

Tudor Girba tudor at tudorgirba.com
Sun Nov 3 17:21:48 EST 2013


Thanks.

Doru


On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel at me.com>wrote:

>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12064/Selecting-a-package-in-the-Monticello-browser
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Nope :(
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:52, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Strange. Pharo 2.0 does not seem to have the replication of repository
> instances problem. Any idea what introduced this?
> >>
> >> Doru
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Benjamin <
> Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per
> package.
> >> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} instances.
> >>
> >> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was
> not reflected to the others.
> >> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced.
> >>
> >> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for
> everything).
> >> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use
> to be :)
> >>
> >> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :)
> >> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this
> painful behaviour (2 sprints ago)
> >>
> >> Ben
> >>
> >> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the
> relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain?
> >>>
> >>> Doru
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin <
> benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages.
> >>>>
> >>>> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times
> >>>>
> >>>> Ben
> >>>>
> >>>> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello browser
> is a rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of repositories
> was useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Doru
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
> alexandre.bergel at me.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set of
> relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the case
> anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated to a
> repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather
> convenient...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alexandre
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> >>>>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Every thing has its own flow"
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>>
> >>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>
> >> "Every thing has its own flow"
> >
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131103/1abf75ed/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list