[Pharo-dev] Pharo3 issues

Esteban Lorenzano estebanlm at gmail.com
Mon Dec 30 08:02:38 EST 2013


On 30 Dec 2013, at 13:26, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess at web.de> wrote:

> for issue 12223
> 
> please revert the changes done for editing history in Nautilus.
> It makes more trouble than it helps.
> It is a nice feature, but it is implementation has too many side effects (discard changes on close, lose changes when jump through the
> history, history has a limit)
> If no one has the time to revert this, just give me a GO, and I'll do it :-)

GO! :)

> 
> 
> Nicolai
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/12/30 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker at inria.fr>
> 
> On 30 Dec 2013, at 12:38, jannik.laval <jannik.laval at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am porting Phratch in Pharo 3.0 and I have some problems with the interface.
> > I uses a one-click Pharo3.0 #30664
> >
> > Here is a list of what I have:
> >
> > - in a debugger, it is not possible to do a Cmd-p to evaluate an expression. This appears only if I select with the mouse. If I make the selection with shift-arrow it works.
> > It means that the selection  with mouse or with shift-arrow are not the same.
> >
> yes, known bug.  Introduced by 12144 TextModel>>getSelection. The only solution seems to be to revert tag for now:
> 
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12521/Undo-12144-TextModel-getSelection
> 
> This will be in the next update. (I was offline more or less since thursday due to helping my brother moving, so this is not integrated yet)
> 
> > - In monticello browser: when I select my project, all the repositories available in Pharo are shown. As in Pharo 2.0, it should show only the concerned repositories (2 or 3 max).
> >
> Yes, this was made on purpose and there is an issue that questions if that idea was good:
> 
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10551/All-Monticello-Repositories-are-added-to-all-Working-Copies
> (this issue is from July)
> 
> 
> > - In a browser, when I did a change in the source code of a method, then I select another method, the changes are lost, without asking if I want to save changes.
> >
> 
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12223/Nautilus-loses-changes
> (issue date: 22/11)
> 
> In short: if there would be more people *actively* helping on the issue tracker front, you would not even have seen those problems.
> 
> 
>         Marcus
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131230/59c7fe40/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list