[Pharo-dev] Are all SLICEs self-contained?

Hernán Morales Durand hernan.morales at gmail.com
Sat Dec 14 18:59:20 EST 2013


I see, thanks for explaining!
Cheers,

Hernán


2013/12/13 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu>

>
> On 13 Dec 2013, at 08:19, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk at me.com> wrote:
>
> > As far as I know all mcz(s) are self contained. But slices for me are
> still a big magic, so maybe there is something different.
>
> Any mcz can have required packages, dependencies that need to be loaded
> with it, outside its own contents.
>
> A slice is an empty mcz, it has no contents of its own, but it does have a
> set of required packages. So loading the slice loads the required packages.
> When you make a slice, you select which dirty packages you want to add.
>
> This explain why sometimes a slice is empty: its required packages are
> missing, either in specification, or in the repository.
>
> Sven
>
> > Uko
> >
> >
> > On 13 Dec 2013, at 05:32, Hernán Morales Durand <
> hernan.morales at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If not, how do I know if a SLICE depends on other SLICEs?
> >>
> >> For example loading
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/edit/11282/Removal-DependentFields-referencesusing Monticello hangs the image and cannot interrupt with Alt+. Do I need
> to load another SLICE before?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Hernán
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sven Van Caekenberghe
> http://stfx.eu
> Smalltalk is the Red Pill
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131214/14171717/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list