[Pharo-dev] Which tests should be run in CI?
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Fri Dec 13 07:50:39 EST 2013
On Dec 12, 2013, at 7:21 PM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com> wrote:
> If it is a compatibility layer, then now that Pharo has it's own #package, shouldn't the Pharo version of Grease just not include it anymore? Once the various Smalltalks start to implement what it is claiming it wants, the compatibility layer for that dialect should change, I would think. So, Seaside should still use #packages, but on Pharo, it gets the native #packages results.
This is exactly the point.
> This assumes that what Grease wants out of package is what Pharo provides - and it is possible that Grease will need different compatibility artifacts to make the Pharo results match what Grease expects.
> I would think from a Grease perspective, the ideal world is to have nothing left in Grease at all because all of the dialects have implemented everything they want, in at least the minimal way they wanted. As a step towards that, having one dialect removing the need for Grease would also be a big, happy step forward.
More information about the Pharo-dev