[Pharo-dev] Categories, packages, and tags [cont'd]

Esteban Lorenzano estebanlm at gmail.com
Thu Dec 12 04:47:06 EST 2013


Stef means "RPackageOrganizer", not PackageOrganizer :)

Esteban


On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Roberto Minelli <roberto.minelli at usi.ch>wrote:

> Thx Stef!
>
> I also found RPackage organizer packages ;)
>
> Cheers,
> R
>
> On Dec 12, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Roberto Minelli <roberto.minelli at usi.ch>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I have a question about the new “PackageTreeModel”…
> >>
> >> In a previous discussion (
> https://www.mail-archive.com/pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org/msg09271.html) we
> discussed about the new package model. Now I understood it but I am
> wondering one thing.
> >>
> >> Since Stef said that categories will be removed, i.e., the ByteSymbol
> representation of what I used to call packages, I am wondering how one
> could ask the system which are the installed packages, tags, etc.
> >>
> >> In short I want to know which is the best method to ask what used to be
> “SystemOrganization categories”.
> >
> >
> > PackageOrganizer default blblablabbleb packages
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131212/3724592f/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list