[Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

phil at highoctane.be phil at highoctane.be
Tue Dec 10 03:56:49 EST 2013

I was more about primitives doing things with I/O.

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
> wrote:

> On Dec 9, 2013, at 10:45 PM, phil at highoctane.be wrote:
> > Now, moving forward, what would be required to have an interpreter
> embedded in C, even if this means having another image with a special API
> and the whole enchilada?
> >
> > At least a working prototype.
> >
> > I have looked at the "Porting the VM" document and the part about
> headless (which is now done differently).
> >
> > What comes to my mind is to define a specific neutral C platform that
> would be able to execute basic bytecode.
> >
> > From videos of Ben, I saw SystemTracer (or SystemTracer2) recreating a
> very tiny image making some noise to prove it was working.
> >
> > Could it be possible to target this kind of tiny image running inside a
> C program through a base interpreter? This would avoid having to deal with
> the whole primitives and plugins at the beginning.
> Guille continued and we are working to use his bootstrap as a basis for
> 4.0.
> Now you will need the key primitives such as become: at: at:put: and other.
> Stef
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131210/3069457a/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list