[Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

Sven Van Caekenberghe sven at stfx.eu
Sun Dec 8 04:24:40 EST 2013


On 08 Dec 2013, at 09:31, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:

> really simple 4  class side methods 

OK, I see that this can be in Pier syntax. No problem for me, but that does mean that we’ll need a Pier parser and renderer in the base image, no ? Else tools will not be able to show this, right ?



More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list