[Pharo-dev] Grease conflicts #packages with RPackage

Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 07:13:04 EST 2013


For us because there are 4 or 5 class side #packages IN PHARO, not grease.


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>wrote:

> and why is a problem for us and for grease?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Because many times you sent class side #packages as part of RPackage
>> framework. But...if you have other class side #packages that answer
>> something different...then you are screw.
>> See my original post:
>> http://forum.world.st/Re-Grease-conflicts-packages-with-RPackage-td4706911.html
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> sorry, but I still do not understand why this is a problem.
>>> can you elaborate why it should not be more implementations?
>>>
>>> Esteban
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I could copy the separate packages, but not the slice.
>>>>
>>>> Please note that the added test is expected to fail on all builds
>>>> containing Grease-Core.
>>>>
>>>> Stephan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mariano
>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131204/2793f467/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list