[Pharo-dev] Grease conflicts #packages with RPackage

Esteban Lorenzano estebanlm at gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 07:11:05 EST 2013


and why is a problem for us and for grease?



On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Because many times you sent class side #packages as part of RPackage
> framework. But...if you have other class side #packages that answer
> something different...then you are screw.
> See my original post:
> http://forum.world.st/Re-Grease-conflicts-packages-with-RPackage-td4706911.html
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> sorry, but I still do not understand why this is a problem.
>> can you elaborate why it should not be more implementations?
>>
>> Esteban
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl>wrote:
>>
>>> I could copy the separate packages, but not the slice.
>>>
>>> Please note that the added test is expected to fail on all builds
>>> containing Grease-Core.
>>>
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131204/4fd1b1eb/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list