[Pharo-dev] method vs. selector consistency?

Denis Kudriashov dionisiydk at gmail.com
Thu Aug 29 08:28:29 EDT 2013


And now Package should be used instead Class category. Am I right?


2013/8/29 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>

> they are "protocols"
> method category is the old non-accurate name :)
>
> Esteban
>
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:44 PM, btc at openInWorld.com wrote:
>
> > Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> >> methodsInCategory: aName     "Answer a list of the methods of the
> receiver that are in category named aName"
> >>
> >>      | aColl |
> >>      aColl := Set withAll: (self organization listAtCategoryNamed:
> aName).
> >>      ^ aColl asArray sort
> >>
> >>
> >> allMethodsInCategory: aName  "Answer a list of all the methods of the
> receiver and all its   superclasses that are in the category named aName"
> >>
> >>      | aColl |
> >>      aColl := OrderedCollection new.
> >>      self withAllSuperclasses do: [:aClass |                 aColl
> addAll: (aClass organization listAtCategoryNamed: aName) ].
> >>      ^ aColl asSet asArray sort
> >>
> >>
> >> uncategorizedMethods
> >>      ^ self methodsInCategory: Protocol unclassified
> >>
> >> all these methods returns selectors and not compiled methods.
> >>
> >> So I would like to rename them accordingly.
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Stef
> >>
> >>
> > When writing about Smalltalk, I am often confused about whether I should
> call them Method Categories or Protocols ?
> > I actually prefer the latter, partly because it reads better in prose
> not having to write Class Categories and Method Categories every time, and
> just Categories and Protocols.
> > Are the terms interchangeable? What is the official stance?
> >
> > cheers -ben
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20130829/59b06f50/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list