[Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30338

Camillo Bruni camillobruni at gmail.com
Wed Aug 21 11:44:47 EDT 2013

On 2013-08-21, at 17:37, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
>>> There are some problems in NativeBoost if a method does not belong to the
>>> class itself, i don't understand the problem very well but that is what
>>> Igor and Stef told me.
> Some methods are placeholder for generated code and the placeholder cannot be avoided and there is nothing wrong in the design.
> This is why such system wide tests should be replaced by rules that each package declare as false positive and adapt to the package own 
> practice. 

but that doesn't justify that the methods have the same contents, AFAIK this is what the test compares.

And I still think form a outside viewpoint duplicated methods do not make sense at all, NativeBoost should be no exception there.

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list