[Pharo-dev] Put issues from cog issue tracker into pharo issue tracker

Nicolas Cellier nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com
Mon Aug 19 16:28:07 EDT 2013

Reporting bugs on fogbugz is not a problem for me.
However, the main concern I have is about the efficiency of these reports...
Will Eliot have access to these reports and use them for his oscog branch?
Will David have access for backporting some common bugs to interpreter VM?
Will the reports be mailed to vm-dev?

After all, I'm not really sure how the old bug tracker was usefull for
oscog or interpreter VM...
But I have the feeling that the reports on fogbugz will be for Pharo VM
branch only.
I'm very happy if I can be usefull to Pharo.
But I'm even more if I can be usefull to Squeak/Cuis too for the same
price, so I feel the move a bit like a loss.



2013/8/10 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni at gmail.com>

> Nicolas Cellier,
> Are you willing to report and maintain VM bugs on the fogbugz issue
> tracker?
> Since you already filed reports on pharo.fogbugz.com I think this is not
> much of a change.
> thank you.
> On 2013-08-09, at 09:33, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9 August 2013 13:28, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> thanks, perfect!
> >>
> >> that's very nice, now we have everything in one place.
> >> Nobody besides Pharo guys touched this issue tracker anyway :)
> >>
> > if that would be true, i wouldn't say anything..
> >
> > The truth is that pharo team is most active on it.. yes. But does that
> > give us right to decide
> > what to do with it?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Igor Stasenko.
> > <Screen Shot 2013-08-09 at 2.31.15 PM.png>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20130819/4153edf8/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list