[Pharo-dev] Uniformizing Pharo

Clément Bera bera.clement at gmail.com
Wed Aug 14 01:26:37 EDT 2013


2013/8/14 Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com>

> i wonder, if we can modify the compiler, so that when it sees that
> method's selector has well known name, it categorizing method
> automatically under right category :)
> (dunno however, what to do about existing code, when you recompiling it)
>

This is possible but I don't think it belongs to the compiler to do that. I
would rather modify Behavior so when it adds a method with no protocol it
categorize it efficiently according to its superclasses / subclasses
selectors and protocols..


>
> On 14 August 2013 04:32, Sean P. DeNigris <sean at clipperadams.com> wrote:
> > Stéphane Ducasse wrote
> >> I started to be fed up about protocol inconsistencies
> >
> > Amen
> >
> >
> > Stéphane Ducasse wrote
> >> So I will propose a set of rules (and a tool - I'm working on it) to
> >> automatically categorize methods.
> >> ...
> >> Now we discussed today with esteban for initialize* we will use
> >> 'initialization'
> >
> > Yay!
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Cheers,
> > Sean
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/Uniformizing-Pharo-tp4703357p4703577.html
> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20130814/042671e8/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list