[Pharo-dev] Bag enhancements

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Mon Aug 12 09:06:11 EDT 2013


Ok I will add instead of elementsAndOccurrencesDo:


On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com> wrote:

> #withOccurrencesDo: matches better the rest of the pharo system (#withIndexDo:, etc) :)
> 
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:49 AM, Gabriel Cotelli <g.cotelli at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Why not #doWithOccurrences: ??
>> 
>> ok it was a proposal for a new selector :)
>> 
>>> 
>>> Eg:
>>> bag doWithOccurrences: [:element :count | "do something"]
>>> 
>>> I dont'like the keysAndValuesDo: idea, is just an implementation detail.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
>>> Hi guys
>>> 
>>> I was surprised to see the API of bag for iteration.
>>> 
>>> I propose to add
>>> 
>>> keysAndValuesDo: aBlock
>>>         "Iterate over the receiver and apply a two argument block on the element and its occurrences."
>>> 
>>>         contents associationsDo: [:assoc | aBlock value: assoc key value: assoc value ]
>>> 
>>> and
>>> 
>>> elementsAndOccurrencesDo: aTwoArgBlock
>>>         "Iterate over the receiver and apply a two argument block on the element and its occurrences."
>>> 
>>>         contents associationsDo: [:assoc | aTwoArgBlock value: assoc key value: assoc value ]
>>> 
>>> Once we agree I will add a bug entry.
>>> 
>>> Stef
>>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20130812/45cc0173/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list