[Pharo-project] Fwd: Meeting Aliens (callbacks) in the debugger - was this risky?
siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 12:19:08 EDT 2012
On 21 March 2012 07:40, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
> Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Schwab,Wilhelm K" <bschwab at anest.ufl.edu>
> Subject: FW: Meeting Aliens (callbacks) in the debugger - was this risky?
> Date: March 21, 2012 1:57:16 AM GMT+01:00
> To: "stephane.ducasse at inria.fr" <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr>
> I am currently unable to post to the list (Outlook is being a pain) - could
> you forward this for me? I'm curious if I'm living dangerously or simply
> basking in Smalltalk's wonderful features.
> From: Schwab,Wilhelm K
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 8:55 PM
> To: pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Meeting Aliens (callbacks) in the debugger - was this risky?
> To see whether one can expect to set breakpoints in callback blocks, I gave
> it shot in #exampleCqsort:
> cb := Callback
> signature: 'int (*)(const void *, const void *)'
> block: [ :arg1 :arg2 |
> self halt.
> ((arg1 doubleAt: 1) - (arg2 doubleAt: 1)) sign
> I then ran the example. To my pleasant surprise/amazement, a walkback
> appeared and the debugger was functional; I was able to evaluate the
> accessors and get numbers. Is this dangerous in some way, or does it "just
> work?" It would be hugely helpful if it is safe.
Should be fine.
Unless you abandon the process :) But there should be a measures
preventing you from doing that.
More information about the Pharo-dev