[Pharo-project] Why don't we always register weakly in SystemAnnouncer?
guillermopolito at gmail.com
Sun Jun 17 09:00:26 EDT 2012
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 June 2012 01:30, Sean P. DeNigris <sean at clipperadams.com> wrote:
> > Igor Stasenko wrote
> >> because 'announcer weak subscribe: ' is explicit
> > Either way, something is implicit. Why not make the common case implicit
> > the uncommon one slightly more verbose? "Make common things easy, rare
> > things possible"
> I bet if you do that, some people will be alienated/antagonized by
> this change (oh... its really hard
> to make everyone happy).
> As a compromise i would suggest to force people to explicitly tell
> their intent.. i.e.
> if they want to subscribe strongly, then they should say:
> announcer strong on:..
> and weakly, is
> announcer weak on:..
> but if they do:
> announcer on:
> they shall get a DNU/error.
He, I like that!
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pharo-dev