[Pharo-project] DBXTalk & seaside / success in Pier one-click / my 1.4 woes follow-up

Cameron Sanders camsanders at aol.com
Mon Jun 11 23:37:19 EDT 2012


Great, Thanks for the feedback! Good points. I appreciate it.

Ciao,
Cam

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Yanni Chiu <yanni at rogers.com> wrote:

> On 11/06/12 10:35 PM, Cameron Sanders wrote:
>
>> Do you need 1.4, and why? -- if you do not mind sharing.
>>
>
> I was building on 1.3, and had a second automated build which tracked
> 1.4. Periodically, I would manually update the 1.4 base image of the
> build to the then latest 1.4. Each of the builds would load the
> framework packages I needed, then load my code base.
>
> This way I could see problems with the frameworks or my code, as 1.4
> progressed. At some point 1.4 was stable enough that I switched over
> (about 6 months ago).
>
>  ... I only recently abandoned my Pharo-1.2 one-click derived image
>> when I had troubles connecting to a DB. I figured it was time to do a
>> complete upgrade. But it has turned into a nightmare, and my project
>> has hit a standstill,
>>
>
> Yep, you don't want to be caught by surprise, when upgrading.
>
>  Pending your answers to my query about why you chose 1.4 over 1.3, I
>> will start fresh again.
>>
>
> In your situation, I would choose 1.4, because Seaside, Magritte2/3,
> DBXTalk should work on 1.4 or will be fixed to work on 1.4 - which may not
> hold true (i.e. the fixing) for 1.3. AFAIK, unless you're heavily attached
> to Omnibrowser, then there is no reason to use 1.3.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20120611/9ef9ed57/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list