[Pharo-project] Next step in cleaning DataStream

Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at gmail.com
Tue Jun 5 07:32:29 EDT 2012


Ok. Perfect. So let's assume DataStream is used only for Motnicello. I will
rename it to MCDataStream, move it to Monticello Package and see all what I
can remove/clean.
I will let you know.

Cheers

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>wrote:

> +1
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I think it is a good proposal. Then it can be in separate package or as
> part
> >> of MC package.
> >
> > I would put DataStream and its friends within the monticello package,
> > and prepend MC to their names. Then, you can clean the resulting
> > classes if you want to.
> >
> > --
> > Damien Cassou
> > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
> >
> > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
> > popular by not having them." James Iry
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20120605/ee553eca/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list