[Pharo-project] renggli mirror created on smalltalkhub
chaetal at gmail.com
Thu Jul 5 00:03:01 EDT 2012
Thank you for all (this and other) explanations you provided on the topic.
When the topic is to provide another backend for storing Smalltalk code, it's absolutely ok and all the advantages are understood.
But when some people say something like "source code is text and nothing more" (at least that's what I hear, though I can be mistaking) and we shouldn't reinvent the wheel… and I see it in context of "Smalltalk is so unpopular"… and the logic is something like: we should popularize it — hence we should use (preferably, only) git for source-code control — and we should abandon images because most developers do not like them, etc, etc. Well, it's a bit scaring, because when I try to extrapolate and understand where it is leading us, I wonder where's Smalltalk there? Do we need it at all?! :)
Once again, I just feel this tendency in our society, and it's very likely I'm misunderstanding and absolutely wrong. I'll be glad to know I am, so I just wanted to clarify.
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 г. at 20:30, Dale Henrichs wrote:
> If you look at the Cypress format (used by FileTree), it is the Monticello package structure "serialized to disk". Reading the Cypress format from disk is no different than materializing the Monticello package structure from an .mcz file. So any program that an reason about the definitions from an .mcz file can reason about the definitions from the Cypress format.
> Cypress format may look like text, but to me I see Smalltalk objects:)
>  https://github.com/CampSmalltalk/Cypress/blob/master/img/CypressStructure-STIC2012.png
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Dennis Schetinin" <chaetal at gmail.com (mailto:chaetal at gmail.com)>
> | To: Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr (mailto:Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr)
> | Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 6:29:40 AM
> | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] renggli mirror created on smalltalkhub
> | On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 г. at 16:11, Damien Cassou wrote:
> | On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dennis Schetinin < chaetal at gmail.com (mailto:chaetal at gmail.com)
> | > wrote:
> | Am I wrong considering migration to Git-or-AnythingElseTextOriented
> | to be a
> | give up on hopes for a real object-oriented source control/management
> | as it
> | could and should be in Smalltalk?
> | can you think of any feature we could have now we couldn't with Git?
> | I didn't say "now", I talked about "hopes". E.g. hopes for "Source"
> | Control Tool being aware of refactorings and other *operations* I
> | apply to my program, instead of treating it as a plain text with
> | some changes of unknown nature. I'm not sure it's possible right now
> | (I know it's not, better to say?). But with a Smalltalk-based source
> | control we can have it on one splendid day in the future. And I
> | think on the Git way we'll finish with just some advanced
> | text-comparison algorithms. No?
> | Best regards,
> | Dennis Schetinin
> | Sent with Sparrow
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pharo-dev