[Pharo-project] A radical proposal (to cut down dead code)
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Sat May 28 10:43:25 EDT 2011
>> The idea of doing Pharo was never to support Squeak's code base (whch is impossible).
> I know your goals, but the question still holds: How do you envision that a user of your system can port her codebase over to the next Pharo version, without going through manual costly painful hours of figuring out what changed and why it changed.
> I know you want a better system, that's cool.
> But I just want a tool that works. If it gets cooler with every iteration, nice. If there is a tool which allows me to do the transition from one version to another semi-automated, even better.
> Otherwise, I will probably stick with an old version until the pain of staying with the old system is bigger than the migration pain.
The PhD of veronica is just about that.
This is why Ring is designed, once Ring is integrated we will be able to build new generation tools
and probably use Torch. Right now pseudo class and friends are not a solution
> I am sure you heard all that before. Thus, my question: Can you envision a tool that allows me to keep up with you guys?
Torch + UnitTests
and we will not change everything all the time.
>> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
> Stefan Marr
> Software Languages Lab
> Vrije Universiteit Brussel
> Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium
> Phone: +32 2 629 2974
> Fax: +32 2 629 3525
More information about the Pharo-dev