[Pharo-project] What we do with: "Embed source code for methods which get uninstalled from their classes" ???

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Fri May 13 07:09:01 EDT 2011


Yes sync with igor

Stef

On May 13, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> Me too. I would rollback until we have a better solution and very well tested. I think right now the consequences and worst than the original problem. 
> 
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker at inria.fr> wrote:
> 
> On May 13, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> >
> > 1) have a fast/normal recompileAll
> > 2) not to loose source code
> >
> > If the only way right now is rollbacking #dropSourcePointer and rollbacking the implementation in objects as methods, please do it. Right now we are in the worst case. For example, today when I discover the bug of loosing sources...I commit my own package with a lots of methods with the decompiled source...it took time to fix it.  So I think it is important to fix this.
> >
> I think we should roll back the change for now...
> 
> All this shows that the source handling is *far* too complex... How would we realize source handling *today* considering today's resources? (aka: compression is free and memory even
> on last year's cell phone 20 times larger than our complete system...)
> 
>        Marcus
> 
> --
> Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 





More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list