[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: [ENH] Syntax extension for continuations

Levente Uzonyi leves at elte.hu
Sun Oct 31 23:33:24 EDT 2010


On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Igor Stasenko wrote:

> On 1 November 2010 05:04, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:

snip

>> foo ; bar ;; baz ; foo ;; bar ; baz.
>>
> this is incorrect syntax.

This is correct: ((self foo; bar) baz; foo) bar; baz.
Message chaining should be equivalent with this, shouldn't it?


Levente

>
>
>> Note that the term 'continuation' means a totally different thing:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuation .
>>
>
> It was called so in tiny smalltalk (if i remember), when i first
> learned a syntax. You name it.
>
>
>>
>> Levente
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
>




More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list