[Pharo-project] PharoKernel #12217

Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at gmail.com
Fri Oct 29 16:53:37 EDT 2010


So....soon we will be able to prepare a Seaside 30 Pharo Kernel image?
:):):):):):)

Since we have Monticello.... great!!

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Krivanek
<pavel.krivanek at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> a good new, Gofer works fine for me :-)
> ...and test results for kernel, network, Monticello and Gofer are quite
> good.
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties:
> >> - better scripts processing
> >> - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded
> packages
> >> - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included),
> >> however it needs some next fixes to work properly
> >> - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive
> >>
> >>
> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip
> >>
> >> The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split
> >> Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately.
> >
> > Yes
> > and that they follow the pattern
> >
> >> If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple
> >> to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore.
> >
> > Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration
> process to it.
> > We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not
> scale) but it requires to have a good alternative.
>
> Well, Configurations were always suspicious to me - they do not even
> share a common superclass :-)
>
> -- Pavel
>
> >
> > Stef
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20101029/ef000692/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list