[Pharo-project] PharoKernel #12217

Pavel Krivanek pavel.krivanek at gmail.com
Thu Oct 28 17:46:53 EDT 2010


Hi,

a good new, Gofer works fine for me :-)
...and test results for kernel, network, Monticello and Gofer are quite good.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties:
>> - better scripts processing
>> - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded packages
>> - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included),
>> however it needs some next fixes to work properly
>> - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive
>>
>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip
>>
>> The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split
>> Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately.
>
> Yes
> and that they follow the pattern
>
>> If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple
>> to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore.
>
> Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration process to it.
> We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not scale) but it requires to have a good alternative.

Well, Configurations were always suspicious to me - they do not even
share a common superclass :-)

-- Pavel

>
> Stef
>




More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list