[Pharo-project] ExpectedFailures in SUnit

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Wed Oct 20 09:48:42 EDT 2010


+1 
the problem is that we should sync with nial for SUNit but since brest I do not know what really make progress.
I still want to know the status of a test. what is red or not when it was packaged and shipped or is is my system the problem

Stef
On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Niko Schwarz <niko.schwarz at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Currently, to mark a test as an expected failure, `expectedFailures`
> should be overwritten
> (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3976596/how-to-mark-expected-failures-in-sunit).
> That's a bit tricky to figure out, so I added a comment to the method:
> SUnit-NikoSchwarz.114. However, I think it's still a usability bug:
> marking something as an expectedFailure isn't visible inside the test.
> 
> I think expectedFailures should look through the pragmas of its tests
> and return an array of all method names that contain the pragma
> <expectedFailure>.
> 
> Yes, that's better. But in addition, sometimes we need conditions. For example:
> 
> Smalltalk listPlugins contains: 'blahhh' ifFalse[ expectedFailures add: 'testBlah' ]
> 
> or whatever condition. Can you do that with pragmas?
> 
> the other problem is that we don't have expectedErrors as well. This is bad and confusing. 
> 
> cheers
> 
> mariano
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niko
> 
> --
> http://scg.unibe.ch/staff/Schwarz
> twitter.com/nes1983
> Tel: +41 076 235 8683
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project





More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list