[Pharo-project] MicroSqueak Was: Re: [update 1.2] #12188
miguel.coba at gmail.com
Mon Oct 11 11:22:32 EDT 2010
El lun, 11-10-2010 a las 10:56 +0200, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
> - Issue 3086: MCMethodDefinition>>shutdown hack to avoid lock down.
> - Issue 2875: PharoKernel Part 11. Thanks Pavel Krivanek and Nicolas Paes
Now that John Maloney has released MicroSqueak as MIT
(http://web.media.mit.edu/~jmaloney/microsqueak/) shouldn't be worth to
analize it and see if that can be used as an alternative to build the
I know that Pavel (and now also Nicolas) have done a lot of work in
getting PharoCore stripped to a minimal kernel.
But as I understand, PharoKernel idea is to part from a core image,
reorganize packages, _unload_ what isn't needed and then shrink the
image to get a kernel image.
The approach of John Maloney's MicroSqueak is the inverse, parting from
a source code representation and from there to aggregate code until have
a full image.
Of course the image from John hasn't all the improvements that Squeak
and Pharo have made to the core classes and that will mean a lot of
effort to reapply in order to get a modern image.
But I wonder, and not meaning to discourage any possibility, if isn't
worth to discuss the technical effort required and the pros/cons of each
approach and if isn't possible a reutilization of knowledge for this
very wanted goal of Pharo.
More information about the Pharo-dev