[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: WeakRegistry>>remove: - when you'll be in trouble
bschwab at anest.ufl.edu
Mon Oct 11 08:42:32 EDT 2010
Since when? Even if operating systems started universally covering for such mistakes, I still would not recommend testing them on it.
From: pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of David T. Lewis [lewis at mail.msen.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 9:54 PM
To: Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: WeakRegistry>>remove: - when you'll be in trouble
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 08:16:57PM -0400, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> The creation of the redundant executors is a recipe for for a double free and resulting crash.
> Am I missing something?
There is no such thing as a "double free and resulting crash".
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
More information about the Pharo-dev