[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: WeakRegistry>>remove: - when you'll be in trouble

Schwab,Wilhelm K bschwab at anest.ufl.edu
Mon Oct 11 08:42:32 EDT 2010


Dave,

Since when?  Even if operating systems started universally covering for such mistakes, I still would not recommend testing them on it.

Bill



________________________________________
From: pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of David T. Lewis [lewis at mail.msen.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 9:54 PM
To: Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: WeakRegistry>>remove: - when      you'll be in trouble

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 08:16:57PM -0400, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
>

<snip>
> The creation of the redundant executors is a recipe for for a double free and resulting crash.
<snip>

> Am I missing something?

There is no such thing as a "double free and resulting crash".

Dave


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project




More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list