[Pharo-project] 16rff broke 16r8e7
Levente Uzonyi
leves at elte.hu
Sun Feb 14 16:01:48 EST 2010
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> As you may know, with 16rff change, we cannot anymore use a radix
> notation combined with an exponent notation.
> At least for base > 14, the exponent letter is taken as an ordinary digit.
> The options are:
>
> 1) revert the change
>
> 2) abandon combined radix+exponent notation
> all the code for printing Float with different radix, and also for
> scanning can be removed
> Or I can provide a subclass of SqNumberParser for backward compatibility.
>
> 3) find a new syntax for radix+exponent
>
> For example, 16r7f_e6 16r7f^6 16r7f#6
> None of these is ambiguous with existing code.
>
> Or maybe use an uppercase R for uppercase only digits...
>
> 4) use q exponent to at least enable base 16
> This is hackish and not universal, but I guess hardly anybody ever
> used a base > 16.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> What would squeak/pharo folks choose ?
>
> -------------------------------------
> Personnally, I'm OK with 1) and 2).
> But 2) deserves a bit more discussion
> After all this is a change of Squeak syntax.
> I find Dan's notation educative and fun, especially for writing tests.
> But it is a non portable Squeakish thing, rarely used, and it does not
> really has much value for industrial usage,
> On the other hand, is it really necessary to parse 16rff ?
>
> I dislike 3) because I find my own propositions bad.
> Also, if we remove Squeak-specific syntax for compatibility reasons,
> why the hell adding a new uncompatible syntax?
> Previous usage of e notation was far better because just extending an
> existing syntax, not creating a new one.
> Maybe you'll have other ideas...
I'd go for 1). Squeak extends the ANSI standard one way, while VW does in
another. If you want portable code, use the standard compatible syntax:
16rFF.
2) is acceptable, but I wouldn't do it.
Levente
>
> Nicolas
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
More information about the Pharo-dev
mailing list