[Pharo-project] Pharo changing the game

Levente Uzonyi leves at elte.hu
Fri Feb 12 10:21:31 EST 2010

On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It is interesting to note that of course, after this was added to 3.9,
>> there was
>>> someone *very hard* arguing that adding Pragmas was a very dumb idea...
>>> Who that person was is left as an exercise to the reader of course ;-)
>> Hint: FFI has its own proprietary hardcoded pragma format. It
>> unnecessary complicates the compiler even when not loaded. Not to
>> mention that it breaks all tools that have their own parser, such as
>> RB for example.
> And I hate having to write <apicall:      in windows and  <cdecl:  in Unix*
> I would love to be the same and that someone else takes care, not me (the
> user).
> Do you know if there is a reason for this?   I imagine that yes.

AFAIK apicall: uses the stdcall calling convention 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_calling_conventions#stdcall), while 
cdecl: uses the cdecl calling convention 
So it depends on the function's calling convention which you should use 
(and not the OS).


>> Lukas
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list