[Pharo-project] {Spam?} Names for the pharo scripting syntax

Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckwich at doesnotunderstand.org
Mon Jan 19 21:32:09 EST 2009

2009/1/20 Damien Pollet <damien.pollet at gmail.com>

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 00:47, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> My first reaction is "why is it not Smalltalk?"  Not the name, but the
> language itself.  Is there something I missed/should read to understand it?
> >
> > +1 , i don't understand too, what makes 'scripting' in smalltalk too
> > different than writing in smalltalk :)
> Smalltalk only has syntax for method bodies, it lacks a (practical)
> one for declaring packages/classes/categories/method declarations in a
> single block of text.

Ok, you add some convenience methods in order to declare packages/classes/
... more easily, but the syntax is still the same ?

Serge Stinckwich
IRD - UR 079 Geodes, MSI Team, Hanoi, Vietnam
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20090120/876a0274/attachment.html>

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list