[Pharo-project] Platform class

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Fri Jan 9 11:06:52 EST 2009


Ok
BTW I tried to load the second version of packages you published and I  
got problem
with MC loading related to some network methods.
I have to redo it calmly and check if this is not necessary to load  
first the first version.
Did you try to load your package in Pharo?

Stef

On Jan 9, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:

> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> I like that
>> I really think that we need to have infrastructure support to control
>> the complexity.
>> I like the OBPlatform idea. After the question is how much layers do
>> we need.
>> I imagine that we should not have that much one this is well done.
>> Does the Platform code you suggest conflicts with some existing ones
>> that could be merged/migrated into.
>
> OBPlatform seems to try to abstract the "Smalltalk platform", whereas
> the platform class I had in mind abstracts the Hardware/OS platform.
>
> Using a similar name certainly will lead to confusion, so the question
> is what else to call an OS abstraction layer. Other than
> OSAbstractionLayer ;-)
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>





More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list