[Pharo-project] Collection extensions

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Tue Jan 6 04:38:32 EST 2009


On Jan 6, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote:

>> So why do we do pharo. Really. If everything as to be compatible with
>> other smalltalk. Terrible.
>> Can't we get smarter?
>
> You are right, this change does not harm anyone not using the method.
>
> We'll have to update our tests of methods not to be sent.
>
> Still, I would rather like to see methods removed from Collection  
> than added.


Yes can you make a list of the ones that are conflicting with other  
implementations?

>> Why can't we tag the methods with <notAnsi> and build a tool that
>> check when you do a fill out.
>
> The problem is that such message sends can't be reliably detected  
> statically.

I lost me here.

Stef




More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list