[Pharo-project] Re: Re: Re: [ANN] Demo with both Truetype +Polymorph
norbert at hartl.name
Tue Sep 23 04:49:05 EDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 10:01 +0200, Marcus Denker wrote:
> On 23.09.2008, at 09:09, Andrew Tween wrote:
> > Note that with a one-click app distribution, it isn't necessary to
> > embed the fonts in the image.
> > FreeType Plus looks for a folder named Fonts relative to the .image
> > file, and loads any fonts it finds from there.
> > Putting the font file(s) into the Fonts folder has these advantages...
> > 1.The image isn't bloated. (embedding a 20Mb font file would grow
> > the image by 20Mb)
> > So, the default font could be a large Unicode one, for example
> > 2.Easier to create a one-click app for distribution.
> > 3.Easier to install the font files into the OS so that other
> > applications can also use them.
> > 4. Free fonts that don't allow embedding can be used (e.g.
> > Bitstream). This widens the choice of available free fonts.
> > The advantage to embedding the font file in the image is that it
> > moves around with the .image file.
> > Which for a one-click app isn't really an advantage at all :)
> We should actually think about moving more data into files... for
> example, there are huge literal arrays
> in UCSTable's class side initialize methods that are only there for
> initializing the class a long time ago.
> These would not even be needed to be read on startup.
> Of course, this is violently against the "everything in the image"
> philosophy of Squeak... but I guess
> that any device one would want to run it on would have a filesystem of
> some sort.
Or there could be a call that reads it in and keeps it in the image.
Easy for people they want to have it in their image.
More information about the Pharo-dev